|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 제목 |
마지막 인용?구 해석 부탁드립니다. ㅠ |
| 작성자 |
영어사랑 |
작성일 |
2018-07-13 |
조회 |
302 |
Somehow, when so many of our other beliefs about the roles of men and women have been revolutionized, our view of the mother-son relationship has remained frozen in time. We've dramatically changed the way we raise our daughters, encouraging them to be assertive, play competitive sports and aim high in their educational and professional ambitions. We don't fret about "masculinizing" our girls.
As for daughters and their fathers, while a "mama's boy" may be a reviled creature, people tend to look tolerantly on a "daddy's girl." A loving and supportive father is considered essential to a girl's self-esteem. Fathers are encouraged to be involved in their daughters' lives, whether it's coaching their soccer teams or escorting their teenage girls to father-daughter dances. A father who flouts gender stereotypes and teaches his daughter a traditionally masculine task?say, rebuilding a car engine?is considered to be pretty cool. But a mother who does something comparable?like teaching her son to knit or even encouraging him to talk more openly about his feelings?is looked at with contempt.?What is she trying to do to that boy?
What is she trying to do to that boy?
이 부분해석 궁금합니다.
1? 저는 " 그렇게 경멸적으로 엄마가 아들에 하는 것을 본다면 엄마가 그러면 아들에게 무엇을 해야하는가?"(?아들이 엄마한테 속 내를 털어 놓고 뜨깨질도 하고 해야 한다.)- 작가의 말로 생각했습니다.
2. 스터디원들은 앞에 contempt라고 보는 사람이 "지금 남자아이에게 무엇을 시도 하는거냐!!" 이러면서 여성스러운 것을 가르치는 것은 안 좋다고 생각합니다.- 앞에 contempt하게 보는 사람의 말로 생각했습니다.
저는 작가가 아닌 말을 쓰는 경우 "~" 사용하는 것으로 아는데 확답 부탁드립니다.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
